How are completed investigations classified in internal affairs?

The classification of completed investigations in internal affairs as "Not sustained, Unfounded, Exonerated" is significant for effectively communicating the outcomes of complaints or allegations against officers. Each term conveys a specific result of the investigation process:

• "Not sustained" indicates that the evidence was insufficient to support the allegation made against an officer. This classification suggests that while a complaint was filed, the investigation did not uncover enough proof to substantiate the claim.

• "Unfounded" means that the investigation determined the allegation was false or illegitimate. It indicates that the events described in the complaint did not occur as reported, suggesting that no violation of policy or law took place.

• "Exonerated" conveys that the investigation found the officer's actions to be justified and within departmental policy. This classification affirms the officer's conduct, indicating that they acted appropriately in the situation at hand.

These classifications are essential for maintaining transparency and accountability within the police department, allowing for an accurate and systematic approach to assessing the legitimacy of complaints against officers. They serve to ensure that all allegations are taken seriously and thoroughly investigated, while also protecting officers from unfounded claims.