What must be true for written examinations to be conducted?

The assertion that written examinations will be at the discretion of the academic team reflects the typical structure within training programs. This means that the academic team's judgment is central to determining when and how these examinations are administered. Their expertise ensures the examinations are aligned with the training objectives and that recruits are adequately prepared.

In contrast, scheduling exams in advance might not always be feasible due to varying circumstances, and it may not maintain the necessary flexibility in the training program. While recruits certainly may benefit from voicing their readiness or suggesting timing, the responsibility does not rest solely on their requests. Additionally, conducting exams only after all practical training is completed would limit opportunities for assessment throughout the training process, preventing instructors from gauging recruits' understanding incrementally. Thus, allowing the academic team to decide the timing and administration of written examinations is crucial for maintaining an effective and responsive educational environment.