What must officers not claim regarding their facial hair according to the guidelines?

Officers must not claim that they are in a constant state of growth regarding their facial hair. This guideline is likely in place to maintain a professional appearance and to ensure uniformity and adherence to departmental grooming standards. By stating they are in a constant state of growth, an officer might imply that they can neglect grooming or let their facial hair become unkempt, which would not align with the professionalism expected in law enforcement settings. This rule ensures that officers present themselves in a manner that reflects well on the department and maintains public trust.

The other options do not hold the same significance in terms of how they might affect professional standards or perceptions. For example, claiming facial hair is naturally curly or that it is always well-maintained could still align with grooming guidelines, as long as the officer adheres to regular maintenance standards. Changing styles frequently could indicate flexibility in personal expression, which might not be as prohibitive under departmental rules as the implication of constant growth.